I’ve worked really hard on django-todo over the years, so was very dismayed to receive email recently from a CompSci student at the University of Western Australia informing me that the department had taken the django-todo source code, removed the license file and all attribution, and included its code in one of their assignments.
Of course I’m all for open source software being used for educational purposes, and would have been honored and pleased if they had done this in an OSS-respecting manner, but they chose to take the legally shady route instead, and to leave students with the impression that this was their original code. This is not how we educate students to become productive, respectful members of the open source software world.
The offending distribution is linked to from the CITS5501 Software Testing and Quality Assurance page – download the file
I do hope the university takes some form of disciplinary action against the professor, who obviously knows better. And I hope the professor does the right thing. In case it’s not clear what “the right thing” is, I’ll spell it out: Restore the license file, and restore attribution from the files you removed it from. Better yet, save yourself a bunch of work and don’t include a copy of the software in your assignment download at all – just link to the github repo! That’s what it’s there for.
5 Replies to “University CompSci Plagiarism”
It is so dismaying to see someone at a school do this.
Ridiculous and unnecessary. Linking to your repo should have given the professor an opportunity to teach about community of developers and open source.
I hope to see a follow up where the professor or department apologizes to you.
To add to how disgusting this university’s behavior is:
The professor has only just replaced the license file on the site, and still not made any notice about the incident, or issued any sort of apology.
He just very stealthily replaced the file without saying anything or acknowledging the issue, so as to escape liability.
Unfortunately for him, I did archive the page around the time this post was written:
So even more shady behavior following the exposure of their theft.
Thanks for the update Ammar. Good to know the license file at least has been replaced. Did he also restore the attribution in setup.py?